Photograph the mark, box the inscription, and check the evidence. Mei helps you find the brand, workshop or craftsperson named on your knife.
No login · one or both sides
01 Add one or both sides
02 Box the complete mark
03 Read it and compare sources
Explore
◎ No account needed◎ Sources on every match57 identities in the casefile151 inscription forms0 retailer catalogs cross-checked
01
Start here
Photograph the maker’s engraving
Keep the camera and blade still. Photograph the same inscription twice, moving a lamp from one side to the other. Box the whole engraving in each photo; avoid clipped glare.
⌗Drop one or both blade sides hereChoose up to two camera-roll photos at once, or take each side separately
Box only the inscription on Side ADrag tightly around the complete inscription, or tap its center. Diagonal engravings are fine; exclude the counter, handle, blade edge, and any model number.
Trace difficult strokes
Show us the strokes.
Trace the kanji directly on the photograph with your finger, pen or mouse. Follow the engraved lines, including disconnected strokes. Your tracing stays on this device.
Draw what you can see. Reading a tracing does not verify the original engraving.
Tap Rotate photo, then drag the photograph around its center to straighten the engraving.
Add a photo to begin. No account needed.
Only the selected crops are sent to Mei’s internal reader. Full photos stay on your device; Mei does not save identification images. Private OCR stays on your device.
Checking reader availability…
More tools: private OCR, visual search & Google Lens
Match the shape, even when the words cannot be read.
Search reference engraving patterns on this device. Include both blade faces to compare their evidence. Similarity scores are experimental, not probabilities.
Reveal faint grooves with lighting
Keep the knife and camera still. Fill the frame with the engraving and focus on its strokes.
Photograph it with a light to the left, then move the light to the right and take a second photograph. Avoid direct reflections into the camera.
Select “Same engraving, different lighting” above, upload the two views, and box the same inscription in each.
This checks contrast, clipped glare, and approximate alignment. It does not reconstruct a 3D surface.
Saved photo references
Save a known maker for the selected photo. Exact-photo recall is separate from OCR and does not authenticate a knife. The saved fingerprint and label stay in this browser; no photo is stored or uploaded.
Labels remain owner submissions until reviewed. Export a labeled reference with your tracing for a future training review; no automatic training occurs.
To search altered copies and similar engraving shapes, also enroll a visual reference. Multiple references per maker are supported. Box an emblem separately and enroll it under the identity you have checked.
The engraving is the starting point
Recognize the engraving.
Look for the identity behind the lettering, the chisel strokes, and the emblem. Upload a photo above and box the complete engraving, then choose how to examine it.
Mei image recognition · no account requiredOptional external cross-check: Google Lens
The main Mei identifier above does not require this step or a Google account. If you choose to leave Mei, it can prepare an engraving crop for Google Lens; Google may ask you to sign in, and Mei cannot control that requirement or read the result automatically.
Image comparison · on your device
Compare the stroke shapes.
Look for visual resemblance when the lettering is difficult to read. This private comparison can suggest an engraving style without inventing a transcription.
Experimental: 31 reference marks cover 30 identities, usually with only one example each. Current testing supports near-duplicate recall, not reliable recognition of a different knife by the same maker. A resemblance is not a confirmed identity.
Private OCR · on your device
Start with the characters.
Try a private transcription first. If the text does not support a maker, Mei also tries image comparison. Your photos stay on this device.
Japanese specialist reader: first use downloads about 55 MB. Detection and reading run on your device.
Best for legible lettering. Correct uncertain characters before using the result.
Scores rank candidates; they are not calibrated probabilities of correct identification. Results appear below. Compare the suggested identity with the actual engraving; worn strokes, glare and unfamiliar marks can remain unresolved.
Best result · Fill the frame, turn off direct flash, and let light rake across the engraving from the side.
Full photo stays on this device
02 / EXAMINE THE RESULT
Recognition results
Check the engraving evidence.
Compare the reading with the actual strokes. A mark can name a brand, smith or sharpener; the result tells you which. Difficult calligraphy and worn marks may need a source comparison or another photograph.
No photo analyzed yetUpload above, or enter the engraving manually.
Your selected engravings
Compare these original crops with the reading and source. Archive lettering below is a typeset reference.
Ranked comparison
Most likely identities
Compared with the full maker engraving casefile.
A text match or model score is not a measured probability. A mark can name a brand, workshop, sharpener or smith. A photograph alone cannot authenticate a knife.
Keep the evidence together.
Compare a candidate, add what you know, or take the case to the forum.
A practical index of frequently encountered Japanese kitchen-knife inscriptions. Every record separates the visible engraving from the entity it actually names, grades the evidence, and links matching examples from 0 specialist retailers. Add a known knife →
No reference records match that search.
Community casefile · Case 003
Add a known knife.
Help improve the reference archive by pairing a clear maker’s engraving with evidence of the knife’s known identity. Every contribution enters a private review queue; it never becomes a match automatically.
Private reviewPending records are not publicEvidence requiredKnown identity, not a guessHuman checkedNo automatic database changes
Withdraw a pending contribution
Your receipt includes a private code. You can withdraw pending or approved photos. This removes them from future reference lookups and deletes their stored photos; the withdrawn receipt is cleared within seven days.
Read with context
The engraving is a clue, not a certificate.
Knife identification is strongest when the inscription, region, construction, packaging, and purchase history agree. A convincing kanji match alone cannot prove who forged or sharpened a blade.
01
Separate place from maker
堺 means Sakai and 越前 means Echizen. They locate a tradition or production area; neither is a maker by itself.
02
Remove boilerplate
登録 means registered, 作 means made by, and 御料理庖丁 simply means cooking knife. The distinctive name usually sits between them.
03
Respect divided labor
Sakai’s traditional system divides forging, sharpening, and handle fitting among specialist workshops. A branded knife can therefore have several makers behind it.
One side may carry the brand; the reverse may name a smith, steel, production region, or line. Include the whole blade in one photo, then add a close, square-on detail of each inscription.
LightTurn off direct flash. For a shallow stamp, move one lamp to the side so highlights and shadows cross each stroke.
AngleKeep the blade face parallel to the camera; the inscription itself can run in any direction.
ScaleInclude the heel, spine, and handle junction.
Evidence desk
Inside the knife workshops.
Explore forging, heat treatment, grinding, sharpening and the people behind Japanese kitchen knives. These regional links lead to knife workshops, manufacturers and dedicated craft records. Each description tells you what you can learn before you open the source.
Sakai Osaka
Follow the specialist stages of a forged knife: forging the blade, grinding and sharpening it, then fitting the handle.
Reading the engraving: the Kitchen Knife Forums kanji lexicon ↗ adds community interpretations. The archive also uses 0 retail catalog correlations for labeled product-photo comparisons; maker pages and craft records provide the primary evidence.